Promoting Freedom for Creative Architecture
So, you’re looking to hire someone to design your next construction project. You may have come across the terms “architectural designer” and “architect” and wondered what the real differences are between the two. Let’s break it down.
Architects and architectural designers follow different educational and training paths. Architects undergo a rigorous and lengthy process that includes completing a professional degree in architecture, gaining relevant work experience through internships, and passing a licensing exam. On the other hand, architectural designers typically have a degree in architectural design or a related field, and may have less stringent licensure requirements depending on their location.
Architects are licensed professionals who are legally allowed to use the title “architect” and are typically the only professionals who can legally provide architectural services for commercial or public buildings. They are trained to manage the entire design and construction process, from developing initial concepts to overseeing the completion of the project. Architectural designers, while also skilled in design, may have limitations on the scope of work they can perform due to their lack of professional licensure.
Architects are held to a higher legal and ethical standard due to their professional licensure and the legal responsibilities that come with it. They are required to carry professional liability insurance and adhere to a code of ethics to protect the health, safety, and welfare of the public. This means that architects are legally accountable for their work in a way that architectural designers may not be.
Unsurprisingly, the cost of hiring an architect versus an architectural designer can differ significantly. Architects, due to their extensive training and legal responsibilities, generally command higher fees for their services. While architectural designers may be more affordable, it’s important to consider the potential limitations in scope and legal protections when making a decision based solely on cost.
So, what’s the bottom line? It ultimately depends on the specific needs and requirements of your project. If you’re in need of someone to take on a complex, large-scale, or public project, an architect may be the best choice due to their training and legal standing. However, for smaller, residential, or less complex projects, an architectural designer may be a cost-effective and suitable option. Regardless of your choice, be sure to thoroughly vet your potential hires and verify their credentials and experience.
